(July 1, 2016 at 1:36 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: We also happen to be volunteers and this is not my hill to die on. The OP seemed to have an ax to grind from the start amd now I feel like I'm being criticized for not being activist enough on behalf of AF.
Of course she has an ax to grind. And of course you're being criticized by her -- and I happen to think she's got a fair point. I'm not sure why either point is below-the-belt; you're listening here, I think, but surely you can't expect everything you hear to be praise.
(July 1, 2016 at 1:36 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: BTW, you misunderstood what I was trying to say. I suppose I explained it poorly. I *never* implied you were advocating for allowing female nipples - that was simply one of the remedies that were possible.
Well, when you wrote "The liability comes from some busybody suing or prosecuting because their little Johnny saw some boobs here." you insinuated that I was ignorant of such liability -- a point I put paid to pages ago (in a post supporting the Staff's legal obligation). There is no liability coming from requiring males to abide by the same doctrine as females, anyway; and given that I never advocated for allowing female nipples to be permitted (and thus put the forum into potential liability), mentioning that in a reply to me demanded address, lest readers assume the insinuation was true.
(July 1, 2016 at 1:36 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Due to some personal issues at the moment, I'm not able to give this the attention it deserves, so I'm going to stop here.
Whatever it is ailing you, I hope you are better tomorrow. Sorry if my speaking up has given you heartburn -- it's not my intention to be the dick here, I just think Heath's point is being given short shrift.
Be well, brotha.