Nudity, Is It Sexist In This Forum?

[bennyboy]

Ps. I did know the rules, I did not break any of them, and I did not provide any false information about them. I didn't want to report you because my internet was slow and upon first inspection I did not know there were naked little girls in your post and I figured you could edit out the naked dude and the ladies boobs and be done.

Second, it's not your place to decide if I am fit to be a mod so you can pretty much kiss my butt. Thank you.

"Pornographic content, pedophilic content, and nudity is not allowed. We consider pornographic content to be an explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity. We consider nudity to be the display of uncovered sexual organs, buttocks, and female breasts."

(from the forum rules)

You showed female breasts.  You have violated the sexual content rules of this forum.  There's no way to argue against this clear fact. So why doncha just go ahead and ban yourself right now. . . or just admit that you've behaved hypocritically and we can move on, right now, and drop it forever.

And National Geographic CAN and does show images of nude children-- because they define nudity in LEGAL terms, not in AF.org, hoping-to-keep-ad-revenue Victorian terms.  So unless you have a link to the article which establishes that "woman's" age, you do not know for sure that she is of the age of majority in the US.  So please-- provide the information which establishes her age, or do not post images of potential child pornography, as defined by this site.

As for "kissing your butt"-- I don't think this kind of obvious sexual talk should be allowed in open forums.  Please move it to A69. . . cuz, you know, we get to just define porn as whatever the fuck we want it to mean, right? I choose to interpret "kiss my butt" as a sexual overture, and I would like to be protected from any further sexual advances. . . I mean. . a KID could be reading that dirty language, right now, and get the wrong idea. Protect the kids, amirite?

Also. . . I wish you'd address the last part of my post, which is really an important issue, and MANY kudos to Thump for standing up to you guys for that.  How do you have a rule which specifically and explicitly targets women, and then claim it's not sexist?