(July 6, 2016 at 12:11 am)bennyboy Wrote:(July 5, 2016 at 11:52 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Unfortunately the staff and, particularly, Tibs, answers to the people who host these sites and they make the decision on what is and isn't appropriate. Especially since this is an open board that anyone can view.I've already offered to pay for the site outright if it means people can express themselves without the influence of corporate sponsors. Any two or three members could easily pay a year's costs (about $400), but I could do it alone if necessary (with probable concessions to my wife).
I'm guessing that's not going to happen, though. Because this really isn't about money. It's about the collision of world views. You guys clearly think mine is dysfunctional (hence the ban for something I consider perfectly normal and harmless), and I have to say it goes the other way-- I think Americans have sick and twisted views on sexuality and on the psychological health of children, and that it is currently doing a very great deal of harm in your country.
But I think that might be a good start for a new thread. Thank you for coming forward and describing your situation honestly. Respect.
To be clear, there is a difference between a host and a sponsor. The host has nothing to do with financing the site. If ever Tibbers comes forwards and says that allowing adult nudity is an option, I would likely vote for it. As of now, it's not even up for a vote.