RE: Amoral Inaction
April 29, 2011 at 12:18 am
(This post was last modified: April 29, 2011 at 12:21 am by Captain Scarlet.)
(April 28, 2011 at 1:48 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote: ..not everything in the universe is explainable just yet...I made no such claim. Refer to your point about rebuttals
(April 28, 2011 at 1:48 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote: Rebuttals really shouldn't include accusations of points that were never initially made.I agree, see above.
You did not offer a answer to Mins question (at least in my opinion) and I disagreed with your unecessary generalizations of theists. You set deism against theism in that response, arguing theism/theists are flawed for their beliefs. If this is the case then you should be able to state why deism is more reasonable than theism (which is why I pointed out that I don't think you can).
With respect to cosmic origins and teleological arguments; I believe there are superior arguments than those tentatively proposed by deism; how is that a sweeping generalisation?
"I still say a church steeple with a lightning rod on top shows a lack of confidence"...Doug McLeod.
