Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 22, 2025, 12:01 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Amoral Inaction
#48
RE: Amoral Inaction
(April 30, 2011 at 9:38 pm)tackattack Wrote:
(April 30, 2011 at 2:45 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote:

To answer your questions:

1.
Quote:your responces to CS and min


The only answer that talks about your belief about your god and isn't some Christian slander I can see in there is :
1a-"the life cycle of all things, for all time has been taken care of a long time ago and I need not worry about anything. That is the difference."
1b-"God puts a hand on this planet"
Technically I fully concede you did answer min's question vaguely. Hopefully you can see where this is a less than a clear definition (with your words in front of you) and I fully admit it was hard to see past all of the emotionalism to pull out what little I could.The point of my observation was to point out your lack of an answer though. I then did try asking a question related to min's question which you refused to answer until this point was conceded. You gave a shitty answer to his question, congratulations, it doesn't help any of us better understand deism and why you chose that over nothing or some other theism.

2- I fully agree that you don't have to be hurt by something to hate it, as you hate Islam. However you don't go on emotional rants about Islam in this thread, so I assumed you hated Christianity, which you admit to. I gave a possible reason and you rejected it without sharing your true reason. OK, you hate Christianity, got it. You don't want to say why, fine. It's not because you were butt raped, good, glad to hear it.

If my addressing your posts isn't clear enough you addressed min's question. It was not succinct and was riddled with emotionalism. If you don't want to compare gods that's fine (I honestly never intended to, just wanted to find out more about deism from a deist), DP already answered some questions.

I am not claiming a superior intelligence or insulting yours. I am claiming you are either being intellectually dishonest or emotionally biased beyond reason. If you don't want to discuss theological philosophies I'm fine with that. If you want to address the claim of your intellectual dishonesty read on (pardon the verboseness).

A)In post 15 you started with "and I made no such claim that theists are flawed in their beliefs -"
Quote: excerpt from post 13 in case you don't remember

which you can see is clearly intellectually dishonest.

B)Also in post 13 you then claimed that you already answered with the above 2 posts and for further info you linked to a deist site. You also claimed "I wasn't asked to prove that my God was better than a theist god .... I already know I cannot prove that. And I don't care to. " Which is true and clearly stated.
Quote: This is as far as I got (about 4 lines) into the site before I saw misinformation and bias

So that clearly wasn't much helping me gathering information about deism, nor were you willing to help further answering my questions. Your refusal to answer simple questions shows closed-mindedness. Your references to your beliefs are biased, as I can only conclude you are emotionally biased beyond sound reason by your use of them.

C)You clearly claimed deism was not theism. I clearly cited clear dictionary references where it was. It is either ignorance, intellectual dishonestly or you making up your own definitions, which?

Before your first response to my posts, I wrote, quote, "I'm not a preacher trying to win souls, if you'ed like to know more ..." and then I left a link for those who would like to know more about Deism. You know as well as I do that the moment I start "sharing information" about deistic beliefs that I open myself up as a target for an onslaught of pointless arguments and ridicules. I was trying to answer a simple question - simply, not defend an entire belief structure to a handful of people that have no legitimate long-term interest in practicing Deism. I don't appreciate it when christians fire off their beliefs at me and I strictly practice not doing the same to others. If Min had asked me, What are the underlying principles that make Deism any more legit than the revealed religions of the world? I wouldn't have answered. I would not have gotten involved with that mess. He did not ask me that question. You were the one who wouldn't let it go. You were the one that wanted to pick it apart and wanted me to jump into a debate about our different belief systems. You can deny it as many times as you like, but your posts say otherwise. You wanted to challenge deism. There’s really nothing wrong with that – just the shitty way you went about it.

I have definitely insulted your religion and I will definitely continue to do so. However, you insulted me personally throughout this entire debate and then tried to back-peddle every time I called you out on it. Congratulations you fit perfectly into the sweeping generalizations that I often make about christians. The only other thing that you have proven to me is that you are very skilled at twisting words around to make them say what you want. EXAMPLES:

1. I said YOU can call me a theist if you like. Deism, Theism – I don’t care & never have.
2. I never made this statement, “inconsistencies of superstition and the negativity of fear that are so strongly represented in all of the "revealed" religions such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam”, and I don’t know where you got this from.
3. Some emotion interjected into a debate does not make that argument “riddled with emotion” and you have used the “emotion” argument in EVERY post you’ve had. Get over it.
4. “Your references to your beliefs are biased” … of course they’re biased. It’s a belief system, not a science. Everyone’s religious references are biased… they have to be – otherwise we’d all love everybody’s stupid religion. Religion by its nature is biased. I don’t know too many muslims who want to hold hands with a Christian and say, “I’m not biased at all against your views and I think you’ve got some really great points.”

Now, if you want to keep beating a dead horse about this, please do feel free, but all I ever wanted to do was answer a simple question – simply. When are you going to let it go? Dead Horse


If you truly wanted to know more about Deism, there is a much better way of doing that than insulting me and claiming that I’m closed minded because I don’t want to engage in an unwinnable and useless debate about our two belief systems.
[Image: Evolution.png]

Reply



Messages In This Thread
Amoral Inaction - by FadingW - April 27, 2011 at 11:35 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Minimalist - April 27, 2011 at 11:38 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by reverendjeremiah - April 27, 2011 at 11:51 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Cinjin - April 27, 2011 at 11:52 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by padraic - April 28, 2011 at 12:06 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Cinjin - April 28, 2011 at 12:10 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Minimalist - April 28, 2011 at 1:29 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Cinjin - April 28, 2011 at 2:39 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Captain Scarlet - April 28, 2011 at 3:59 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Cinjin - April 28, 2011 at 1:48 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Captain Scarlet - April 29, 2011 at 12:18 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Cinjin - April 29, 2011 at 2:34 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Captain Scarlet - April 29, 2011 at 4:54 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by orogenicman - April 28, 2011 at 4:38 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by DeistPaladin - April 28, 2011 at 9:22 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Doubting Thomas - April 28, 2011 at 10:09 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by reverendjeremiah - April 29, 2011 at 6:26 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by tackattack - April 29, 2011 at 7:11 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Cinjin - April 29, 2011 at 11:24 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by DeistPaladin - April 29, 2011 at 9:43 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Gawdzilla - April 29, 2011 at 9:46 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by tackattack - April 29, 2011 at 10:04 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by DeistPaladin - April 29, 2011 at 10:32 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Captain Scarlet - April 29, 2011 at 3:42 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by DeistPaladin - April 29, 2011 at 3:51 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by thesummerqueen - April 30, 2011 at 6:18 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Captain Scarlet - April 30, 2011 at 7:01 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Gawdzilla - April 29, 2011 at 10:34 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by DeistPaladin - April 29, 2011 at 11:14 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by corndog36 - April 29, 2011 at 10:46 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by DeistPaladin - April 29, 2011 at 11:12 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by tackattack - April 29, 2011 at 11:13 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by thesummerqueen - April 29, 2011 at 12:46 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Cinjin - April 29, 2011 at 12:58 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by tackattack - April 29, 2011 at 1:05 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Cinjin - April 29, 2011 at 11:40 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by tackattack - April 30, 2011 at 6:49 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Cinjin - April 30, 2011 at 12:12 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by tackattack - April 30, 2011 at 1:27 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Cinjin - April 30, 2011 at 2:45 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by tackattack - April 30, 2011 at 9:38 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by Cinjin - May 1, 2011 at 1:35 am
RE: Amoral Inaction - by thesummerqueen - April 29, 2011 at 1:07 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by DeistPaladin - April 29, 2011 at 1:14 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by tackattack - April 29, 2011 at 1:08 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by thesummerqueen - April 29, 2011 at 1:12 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by tackattack - April 29, 2011 at 1:22 pm
RE: Amoral Inaction - by thesummerqueen - April 29, 2011 at 1:37 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  trying to adopt an amoral worldview bonbonbaron 46 6413 January 26, 2021 at 12:23 am
Last Post: John 6IX Breezy



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)