Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 29, 2025, 1:02 am

Poll: Monogamous or not
This poll is closed.
monogamous
76.92%
30 76.92%
not monogamous
15.38%
6 15.38%
some other description
7.69%
3 7.69%
Total 39 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Monogamous or not.
RE: Monogamous or not.
(June 27, 2016 at 11:56 am)paulpablo Wrote:
(June 27, 2016 at 8:30 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote: 1) You can, but it is easy like you state? Fuck no, that's anecdotal shit and the fact that you can't even concede that is pathetic. Plus location wasn't the only factor I brought up, try again sweetheart.

2) It's not only about location...fucking shit...You completely jumped the shark, go argue with someone your own intellectual caliber, perhaps a fire hydrant or a feminist.

1) You can find non monogamous women on here, on various websites, if you can't find non monogamous women online you're bad at using the internet.  I stand by that.

2) Yeh you didn't just say location, you said it depends on age, gender variables like that, but variables like that don't matter, you could be a 100 year old hermaphrodite and still be able to use the internet to find non monogamous women, they might not be attracted to you but you can still find them.

1) Holy shit, you don't get to speak to everybody's difficulty level when it comes to finding what they want just because you think it's easily to get what you want.

2) So you accept that there are reasons why it's not easy to find what you want but instead of concede your flawed position you just bypass it by saying it's easy anyway. Good call pal...
If the hypothetical idea of an afterlife means more to you than the objectively true reality we all share, then you deserve no respect.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 5, 2016 at 10:14 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Thumpalumpacus - June 5, 2016 at 10:21 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 5, 2016 at 10:23 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 5, 2016 at 10:27 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Ravenshire - June 5, 2016 at 10:53 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 5, 2016 at 10:26 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2016 at 7:28 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 10:38 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 5, 2016 at 10:52 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 10:59 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 5, 2016 at 10:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 5, 2016 at 10:41 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 6, 2016 at 7:37 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Jenny A - June 6, 2016 at 2:50 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 6, 2016 at 3:53 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Heatheness - June 5, 2016 at 10:43 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by J a c k - June 5, 2016 at 10:55 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Catholic_Lady - June 5, 2016 at 10:56 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 5, 2016 at 11:01 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 11:02 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 5, 2016 at 11:06 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 11:07 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Thumpalumpacus - June 6, 2016 at 11:19 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by madog - June 5, 2016 at 11:11 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 6, 2016 at 12:11 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 6, 2016 at 12:39 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 6, 2016 at 4:00 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 6, 2016 at 6:02 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2016 at 6:37 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 6, 2016 at 4:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 6, 2016 at 4:26 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 6, 2016 at 6:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 6, 2016 at 8:08 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 6, 2016 at 8:31 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by brewer - June 7, 2016 at 6:54 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 7, 2016 at 7:32 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by brewer - June 7, 2016 at 7:35 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 9, 2016 at 4:55 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 9, 2016 at 8:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 7:36 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 7:38 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:05 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:09 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:11 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:12 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:14 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:15 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:19 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:22 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:25 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:27 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:28 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 9:07 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by bennyboy - June 27, 2016 at 8:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:06 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 8:25 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:30 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 9:17 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:07 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 11:56 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:09 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 6, 2016 at 7:36 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 6, 2016 at 6:01 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by account_inactive - June 6, 2016 at 6:24 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by brewer - June 6, 2016 at 7:39 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Jenny A - June 6, 2016 at 2:44 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2016 at 4:20 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Gemini - June 6, 2016 at 8:46 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Athene - June 6, 2016 at 9:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by KevinM1 - June 7, 2016 at 1:58 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Catholic_Lady - June 7, 2016 at 3:41 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 7, 2016 at 3:56 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 7, 2016 at 6:43 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Thumpalumpacus - June 7, 2016 at 10:12 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 9, 2016 at 4:50 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - June 7, 2016 at 7:03 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 7, 2016 at 8:08 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by J a c k - June 7, 2016 at 8:32 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by lisah - June 11, 2016 at 8:11 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by J a c k - June 7, 2016 at 8:35 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Valkyrie - June 7, 2016 at 8:37 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 7, 2016 at 10:10 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 8, 2016 at 5:57 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 8, 2016 at 2:48 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 8, 2016 at 3:50 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 8, 2016 at 4:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 8, 2016 at 6:39 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 8, 2016 at 3:05 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by YahwehIsTheWay - June 9, 2016 at 10:02 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Cecelia - June 10, 2016 at 6:36 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 10, 2016 at 6:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 7:52 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Expired - June 27, 2016 at 7:56 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 7:59 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by bennyboy - June 27, 2016 at 8:07 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 8:31 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:34 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 8:53 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by chimp3 - June 27, 2016 at 9:01 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - June 27, 2016 at 9:05 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by chimp3 - June 27, 2016 at 9:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - June 27, 2016 at 6:05 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 27, 2016 at 9:09 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 9:17 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 27, 2016 at 9:19 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 12:28 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:12 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by mlmooney89 - June 27, 2016 at 12:37 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 12:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:17 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Grand Nudger - June 27, 2016 at 3:25 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Viking - July 16, 2016 at 7:10 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by BrokenQuill92 - July 16, 2016 at 8:27 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - July 16, 2016 at 9:16 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by rexbeccarox - July 16, 2016 at 9:55 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - July 16, 2016 at 10:12 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - July 17, 2016 at 1:22 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - July 17, 2016 at 2:21 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - July 17, 2016 at 3:18 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Viking - July 17, 2016 at 4:08 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - July 17, 2016 at 4:10 am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)