The "Cultural Context" Excuse
August 1, 2016 at 8:52 pm
(This post was last modified: August 1, 2016 at 8:53 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(August 1, 2016 at 7:12 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(August 1, 2016 at 6:08 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: I'm not in the mood for another abortion debate, sorry.But y'all will discuss Noah Ark ad nauseam.
The point wasn't about abortion the point was about hypocrisy.
you stated.
(July 30, 2016 at 5:19 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: And this analogy points up the flaw in the argument that God "has the right" to do whatever he wants, because no parent has cart blanche to do what they want to their children regardless of age. Where did he acquire this right? How are you defining a 'right'?
You clearly stated that "no parent has carte blanche to do what they want to their children REGARDLESS of AGE", yet you clearly don't take that position when it comes to abortion.
What Christians are saying is that God is sovereign, he has supreme authority over his creation. If you are pro-choice then you are essentially saying that a woman has sovereignty over her body and has the right to choose between the life and death of her unborn child (HER creation, in part) What gives her that right? Why is it wrong for God in one case and right for the woman in the other?
See the contradiction?
(August 1, 2016 at 6:12 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: God committed mass genocide, save for one family. What more evidence does anyone need?!
Now you consider biblical scripture evidence? Interesting...
Will you consider it as evidence going forward?
I consider it evidence of the character of the character. Not evidence of the existence of the character himself.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.