Answer your own questions Nap & stop depending on never doing so and letting everyone else do that for you.
(May 8, 2011 at 10:37 am)theVOID Wrote:They deny it a. accepting it as existent and b. with reason(May 8, 2011 at 10:26 am)fr0d0 Wrote: YECs deny evolution using spurious (to you and I) evidence and reasoning. They present evidence and reasoning nonetheless for us to reject.Which makes what bit of difference to the claim that you do not need to understand something to deny it?
(May 8, 2011 at 10:37 am)theVOID Wrote: without explaining God to him you have no way of knowing that he does not understand it.Nap made the statement challenged. A positive claim. Why are you defending his debt of defense of his extraordinary claim?
(May 8, 2011 at 10:37 am)theVOID Wrote: you can deny something without understanding it, you cannot be justified in denying it however.Indeed
(May 8, 2011 at 10:37 am)theVOID Wrote: What specifically was the positive claim that he made?He is denying that God exists.