RE: What's up
May 8, 2011 at 11:36 am
(This post was last modified: May 8, 2011 at 11:41 am by reverendjeremiah.)
(May 8, 2011 at 10:10 am)Napoleon666 Wrote:(May 8, 2011 at 10:07 am)fr0d0 Wrote: You can't deny what I believe because you don't understand it.
There is not a requirement to understand something to deny something. Again you seem to be making up your own definitions.
Its typical for believers to redefine words.. I just went through a 3 page argument with Tack and him trying to redefine forgiveness as an act that not only must be given, but accepted as well. In reality (i.e. "non-christian" world) forgiveness is a one way act, and the receiving end doesnt even have to be aware of it.
In the end Tack gave up the conversation when I gave him an unquestionable example: "If a man wrecks his car into my car, killing himself and my infant child, then you are saying that I will never be able to forgive him because he is DEAD and therefore cannot receive my forgiveness. That is untrue, because I can forgive him regardless of wether he is alive, dead, aware or not."
Then again, some christians feel the need to redefine words to fit their agenda of salvation thinking it will convince people to convert and "get saved". All it does for me is show how willing they are to be liars for christ. Tack's obvious goal was to make the definition of forgiveness exactly resemble the act of accepting Jesus into your life... and it didnt work at all: http://atheistforums.org/thread-6780.html
(May 8, 2011 at 10:22 am)theVOID Wrote: Secondly, Why not tell him in your own words what god is before you claim that he does not understand?
If fr0d0 did such a thing, he would have to remove that "agnostic" image from his signature.
Then again, Im not buying that he is agnostic anything at all...who else here see through that crap and doesnt believe that agnostic claim from fr0d0?
