I think Wikipedia is a very useful site you can find useful info about any subject there maybe some small errors but taking into consideration the wast amount of info it's really hard to check evrything, and also the amount of information incorrect is representing a small part of it and to be honest after 4 years of "seeking" information on it I only found few errors nothing earth-shattering just minor ones
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 22, 2025, 4:58 am
Thread Rating:
|
Reliability of Wikipedia.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Reliability of Wikipedia. - by leo-rcc - April 8, 2009 at 1:02 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by marcel90 - April 8, 2009 at 1:20 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Tiberius - April 8, 2009 at 1:36 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by leo-rcc - April 8, 2009 at 2:29 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by fr0d0 - April 8, 2009 at 2:55 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 8, 2009 at 3:01 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by leo-rcc - April 8, 2009 at 3:14 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 8, 2009 at 4:14 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Meatball - April 9, 2009 at 4:57 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 11, 2009 at 3:47 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Meatball - April 12, 2009 at 4:22 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 12, 2009 at 5:25 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Meatball - April 12, 2009 at 9:11 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 13, 2009 at 2:39 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by leo-rcc - April 13, 2009 at 2:45 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 13, 2009 at 2:47 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by padraic - April 9, 2009 at 8:15 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by leo-rcc - April 10, 2009 at 2:55 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Overmars - April 12, 2009 at 3:37 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by leo-rcc - April 13, 2009 at 3:38 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 13, 2009 at 3:47 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Tiberius - April 13, 2009 at 2:12 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 13, 2009 at 2:36 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by padraic - April 13, 2009 at 7:49 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 14, 2009 at 4:18 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by padraic - April 14, 2009 at 4:44 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 14, 2009 at 7:06 am
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Good Wikipedia article on the History of Atheism. | Jehanne | 6 | 1976 |
April 5, 2017 at 12:45 am Last Post: Little lunch |
|
| Greatest Wikipedia page of all time? | Mudhammam | 11 | 2130 |
August 5, 2014 at 9:10 am Last Post: ignoramus |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
