(August 7, 2016 at 6:04 am)m0nk3y Wrote:OK(August 7, 2016 at 5:55 am)robvalue Wrote: How is this falsifiable?
If it's not testable, it's not science. It's just a bunch of assertions.
It also claims sensory is greater than words, and should, and is, used moreover word to communicate.
With the same scientific method, but sense and not word based. There are grounds for agreement over the subject of a direct relation to the [entire] universe, and we can test it with our senses.
I guess we can assume this is a chat bot.
No?