(August 11, 2016 at 1:39 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: WLC is a fraud as you demonstrated nicely in your KCA debate a few months back.
That would be an ad hominem rebuttal.
Additionally, your conclusion is utterly ridiculous. Someone that writes articles and books for 40 years and debated many of the top atheists in he world all over the world and get invited to Oxford to speak regularly cannot be labeled a fraud. I am not surprised at the statement from someone with a scientism worldview and says philosophy without science is literally day dreaming in the last post.
If you care about the truth and not just about opinions you glean from the great minds of AF, http://www.reasonablefaith.org/william-l...blications
Unless of course you want to point out precise fraudulent activity of WLC and prove your point...
