RE: Would you have a relationship with a member of your immediate family?
August 11, 2016 at 10:52 pm
(This post was last modified: August 11, 2016 at 10:54 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(August 11, 2016 at 10:29 pm)Nymphadora Wrote:(August 11, 2016 at 4:00 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Not beyond the relationships we share now, which are normal.
Pretty sure it wasn't "eww" that was the problem, but rather the fact that you came across as supporting legislation based on "eww". There is a difference, and I'm surprised you can't seem to see it.
Because people like to imagine I said something I didn't say. Yeah. That always goes over well.
If you'd like me to dig back through your posts and link to the quotes, I will.
It ain't my imagination, honey, it's your spin. Let me know when you want to roll. Until then, shitcan the bullshit insinuations. The folks here took you at your word, and you backpedaled, but you don't have the honesty to say as much here.
You weren't criticized for saying "eww". You were criticized for thinking that "eww" should justify a law. Don't like it? Tough shit, kid. If you don't have the reasoning to support your argument, you should quit your fucking whining outside that thread. And if you do have the reasoning to do so, put it in that thread already.
But this public martyrdom of yours, that you brought upon yourself with thoughtless words -- fuck off with it.
Again: I'll be happy to provide links. Just you say the word. We can do this!