dino bones

[Esquilax]

soft tissue in dinosaur bones is a problem for evolutionist. 
It's absolute proof dinosaurs are no way as old as they first thought.
Science has failed us and the science books should be rewritten.

Whoops, wrong again, creationists.

The reports of the soft tissue, though remarkable, have been sensationalized further. The tissues were not soft and pliable originally. The tissues were rehydrated in the process of removing the surrounding mineral components of the bone (Schweitzer et al. 2005). Moreover, it is unknown whether the soft tissues are original tissues. Fossil flexible tissues and nucleated cells have been found before in which the original material was not preserved (Stokstad 2005).

The age of fossils is not determined by how well they are preserved, because preservation depends far more on factors other than age. The age of this particular bone was determined from the age of the rocks it was found in, namely, the Hell Creek Formation. This formation has been reliably dated by several independent methods (Dalrymple 2000).

Bolding mine.

Looks like you haive failed us: perhaps you should consider a rewrite of the belief system that led you to be taken in by ideologically motivated lies?