(May 12, 2011 at 1:42 am)SleepingDemon Wrote: Hmm nice. Don't take that to mean anything more than it is though. Life having no purpose may answer the question, however it is simply the neutral position. Life has no purpose until someone discovers one. (If it exists.) And thank you. I'm not the type that resorts to namecalling during a discussion. And while I am a goldfish in philosophy, I am a shark in theological debates. ;-)
Oh that's cool, I taught debate for a little bit, had a lot of fun doing it. Well I don't believe you can logically have such a thing as a "neutral" position when it comes to theological matters I am afraid. It really is one of the most brilliant aspects of the Bible; it effectively cut out any middle ground logically. If it really was written by just dumb sheep herders and fisherman they seemed to have a pretty advanced understanding of logical argumentation. :-)
A little off topic but do you believe science has limitations?