(August 19, 2016 at 6:35 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(August 19, 2016 at 6:32 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I thought it was in there, but went back, and found it was not. But what I was referring to is that any science that is not from first hand experience, but is knowledge based on what others observed. Witnesses are unreliable right?
Wrong, science is based upon experimental observations that are replicable. It doesn;t matter whether or not someone else saw it, if no one else sees it when they do the same thing. In fact, it doesn't matter that almost everyone sees it...if a single person doesn't. That's the -entire- point of peer review and replication.
You're welcome.
But they could be lying, crazy, or made a mistake?