(May 13, 2011 at 1:59 pm)ib.me.ub Wrote:(May 9, 2011 at 10:58 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: With your description, my initial reaction is that this is much like "scientific pantheism". For the scientific pantheist, "God" is the sum total of the universe but that universe isn't conscious or acting in any deliberate way. So basically, they're atheists with some pointless category confusion.
How did you possibly extract this from the OP.
That what the OP describes as "Satanism" is, as my reply stated, hedonism with some pointless category confusion that has to be continually explained and clarified nearly every time he uses the label.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
