Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 15, 2025, 3:00 pm
Atheist Forums › Discussion › Skepticism & Pseudoscience v
Can a lack of evidence be considered proof?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Can a lack of evidence be considered proof?
Silver Offline Donators
Faith's Nightmare
*****
Religious Views: Infidel Savant
Posts: 33631
Threads: 1422
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation: 152
#13
RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof?
August 21, 2016 at 2:26 am
Simplified version:

If proof is not provided over thousands of years, guess what?
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › Skepticism & Pseudoscience v
Can a lack of evidence be considered proof?

Messages In This Thread
RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof? - by Silver - August 21, 2016 at 2:26 am
RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof? - by Silver - February 1, 2017 at 1:58 am
RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof? - by Asmodee - February 1, 2017 at 11:39 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proof of creation no atheist can debunk (100% bulletproof) insider432 277 132911 August 22, 2014 at 1:10 pm
Last Post: pgrimes15



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)