Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 15, 2025, 2:42 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Can a lack of evidence be considered proof?
#19
RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof?
I think with unfalsifiable topics like god, nobody can give us conclusive proof.
What's left? Anecdotes, subjective evidence?

Ths is why theists love putting god in any dark gap of science.
Not so much to convince atheists, but because they are more than happy with the lack of proof of his non existence.
This way, no one can touch their delicate beliefs and can sleep comfortably at night.

To atheists, lack of evidence is why most agnostics don't believe.
But for many theists, it's the only reason they do believe.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof? - by ignoramus - August 21, 2016 at 5:56 pm
RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof? - by Silver - February 1, 2017 at 1:58 am
RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof? - by Asmodee - February 1, 2017 at 11:39 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proof of creation no atheist can debunk (100% bulletproof) insider432 277 132910 August 22, 2014 at 1:10 pm
Last Post: pgrimes15



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)