Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 15, 2025, 8:46 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Can a lack of evidence be considered proof?
#20
RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof?
(May 27, 2016 at 8:40 pm)ignoramus Wrote: 1) If it's hot, sunny and dry outside, will anyone question that it's not cold, wet and raining?

2) If you do not have any hands, is that not proof that you didn't choke your neighbour to death?

3) If I love eating steak, is that not proof that I'm not a vegetarian?

4) If there is no trace of our sentient creator anywhere in the universe, does that not prove that he doesn't exist?

Theists, you don't have to be captain Obvious. Just use a tiny bit of common sense and trust your instincts.

Realise that wishing something to be real is nice but won't actually make it real.
Not even your God had the power to poof himself into existence....sorry...have a great day! Shy

Guess I'll play now.

1. Probably not. Unless I think globally, then probably yes.
2. No. Stop chocking me with your thighs. (wishful thinking?)
3. No. You just don't have access to animal flesh anymore.
4. If you mean god, YES.

3/4ths contrarian.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof? - by brewer - August 21, 2016 at 7:59 pm
RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof? - by Silver - February 1, 2017 at 1:58 am
RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof? - by Asmodee - February 1, 2017 at 11:39 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proof of creation no atheist can debunk (100% bulletproof) insider432 277 132901 August 22, 2014 at 1:10 pm
Last Post: pgrimes15



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)