(August 24, 2016 at 1:28 pm)ScienceAf Wrote:From the TWELVE year old, folks.(August 24, 2016 at 11:39 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: You could just teach them science...
http://scienceagainstevolution.info/v17i1f.htm
And for those who say that there is no controversy.... good, So I can look at what any scientist says, and go from there, and assume that all other scientist agree with them.
http://www.uncommondescent.com/
That's the problem, some creationists seem to think that it should be taught in science class!!!
They already teach me about Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, Judaism etc. in history class.
History can be a science itself.
And there is no controversy against science itself because...
Creationism is not a theory, and not even hypothesis.
Science is full of theories and hypothesis, the theory of relativity (which is in question), the theory of gravity, etc.
You may be asking...
What's the difference?
Well dear, an hypothesis is a testable idea that may or may not be plausible.
God/Creationism is not testable, and creationism has been disapproved with the Theory of Evolution.
There are other theories but for now Evolution is the most plausible and the other theories would still be more testable than creationism.
And a theory is a hypothesis that has been tested, controlled, repeated through multiple labs/experiments.
Like Evolution.
Save

Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.