(May 14, 2011 at 12:40 am)ib.me.ub Wrote: pff. Yeah, about as clear as mud. I just find it interesting your choice of example & the way you worded it.
OK, I'll try one last time.
People who invoke deities or other supernatural agents in the labels they use to describe their beliefs ought to have, as a bare minimum, some belief that said deity/supernatural agent is a conscious being that's out there somewhere.
Otherwise, they're atheists who are engaging in category confusion.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
