(May 8, 2011 at 2:44 pm)tesseract7d Wrote: It's not supposed to be an exact analogy, Godschild. It attempts to demonstrate that repeated instances of microevolution eventually add up to macroevolution, along with a few other more nuanced points which I doubt you'd understand. Your argument is akin to saying that our theory of motion is incorrect because it's always the same matter. All you're doing is demonstrating your lack of intelligence.
Yes, I see that the small changes resulted in color change, I can accept that, however the letters and words never change into something completely different, that would have represented macro. With out mans help those words would not have ever changed color except mabe fade away as the therory of evolution will one day do.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
