(May 15, 2011 at 6:22 pm)Godschild Wrote:(May 8, 2011 at 2:44 pm)tesseract7d Wrote: It's not supposed to be an exact analogy, Godschild. It attempts to demonstrate that repeated instances of microevolution eventually add up to macroevolution, along with a few other more nuanced points which I doubt you'd understand. Your argument is akin to saying that our theory of motion is incorrect because it's always the same matter. All you're doing is demonstrating your lack of intelligence.
Yes, I see that the small changes resulted in color change, I can accept that, however the letters and words never change into something completely different, that would have represented macro. With out mans help those words would not have ever changed color except mabe fade away as the therory of evolution will one day do.
Are you a troll?
The two colours represent 2 different species, and the words represent a trait gained by the species with evolution
