Macroevolution

[Godscreated]

It's not supposed to be an exact analogy, Godschild. It attempts to demonstrate that repeated instances of microevolution eventually add up to macroevolution, along with a few other more nuanced points which I doubt you'd understand. Your argument is akin to saying that our theory of motion is incorrect because it's always the same matter. All you're doing is demonstrating your lack of intelligence.

Yes, I see that the small changes resulted in color change, I can accept that, however the letters and words never change into something completely different, that would have represented macro. With out mans help those words would not have ever changed color except mabe fade away as the therory of evolution will one day do.

Are you a troll?

The two colours represent 2 different species, and the words represent a trait gained by the species with evolution

The words are there at the beginning, how can that be a trait gained. There are far more colors than two, if you can not make that simple observation you would lose many facts in research. The words is the species and the single color that is at the beginning is the trait that changes due to out side forces. The words stay words and the color is all that changes there is no macro here, only a variation within the same species and this does not constitute evolution.