RE: How do you deal with life now that you are an atheist? (With a little of my life)
August 31, 2016 at 3:39 am
(August 31, 2016 at 2:49 am)robvalue Wrote: You appear to be telling us what any potential universe would be like, and that you have a model for it. How do you know any of this is true? We have one data point. You're making assumptions that other universes must be follow a bunch of rules similar to the ones this one has. Your "falsifiable criteria" is based on modelling this universe and comparing it against itself, as far as I can see. We can't retest it. This universe fits your criteria. Can I perform any additional tests that could actually falsify it? Just recounting the same data you already decided fits your model is not another test.Yes and that each one is exactly* the same. It's completely deterministic model as there is only one Thing to be expressed or quantized.
The beginning state prior to existence I am working from is no different than the singularity of time, space and matter proposed by the Big Bang theory...only I'm canceling out the external "nothing space" that does not exist. There is no perspective outside the singularity. It is not "infinitesimally small" because that is a false perspective of scale (our scale) overlayed with it....in an imagined nothing space outside of it that does not exist. The singularity has no boder, it contains all space, time and matter. It is not a finite amount relative to a nothing space outside that does not exist.
Instead of the false perspective of treating the singularity like a particle, I'm treating it like a field of matter in equilibrium with no external border that "quantum fluctuates" in a regular pattern of waveforms that are all finite spatial expression of the original infinite field of matter. It is completely deterministic and geometrically self limiting.
The model geometrically predicts a slight negative curve of space time. If it's proved to be positive or flat, the model is falsified.
If the dark energy constant was found to be 40% or 92% or any other percent beyond current refined calculation by a reasonable amount (half a percent), the model is falsified.
If a fourth density of quarks are found to be render-able in particle accelerators it would falsify the model.
If our local observable universe doesn't have a preferred direction of motion or hemispherical asymmetry in the CMB it would falsify the model.
If anti-matter could not be "created" it would falsify the model.
If the travel of electric current didn't go hand in hand with a magnetic field effect with infinite range it would falsify the model.
If space-time reversed expansion it would certainly falsify the model, but it would be met with warmth.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a04db/a04db6ded21f9061a67790682148b1f19890b45c" alt="Big Grin Big Grin"
Help me answer you, what are you looking to be able to falsify about it?
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder