RE: How do you deal with life now that you are an atheist? (With a little of my life)
August 31, 2016 at 11:39 am
(August 31, 2016 at 4:03 am)Arkilogue Wrote:(August 31, 2016 at 3:48 am)robvalue Wrote: This isn't science. It's not a new way of doing science, it's just assuming your conclusion. You're just saying "Designed stuff would act this way. Oh look, it acts that way." I can just as easily say the contrary. Where is your non-designed control data for comparison? And I mean actual data, collected from another actual universe?I'm not saying "designed stuff would act this way" I'm say a round vibrating container of water predicts a round internal standing wave, a square container predicts a square wave, a spherical container predicts a spherical internal standing wave-form. What are atoms?
A maximum density sphere pack of equal sized spheres predicts an expansive spatial constant of no more than 74% on each sphere
There is no need or possibility of data from another universe.
You often say this sort of thing in response to whether things are designed as they are. But identifying causal relationships in the universe is a far way from showing that anything was designed. It's like looking at how irregularities in grounds surface determine ('design') the shape of a rain puddle. Yes, certain things are owing to certain other things. But from none of this should we feel the coming together of some grand design.
