RoadRunner,
I think that the concept of necessary being is always relativistic. If not, all we are saying is that a being is necessary because we say so. Saying that something cannot 'not exist', begs the question 'why?', which can only be answered by pointing at an existant that it caused.
I think that the concept of necessary being is always relativistic. If not, all we are saying is that a being is necessary because we say so. Saying that something cannot 'not exist', begs the question 'why?', which can only be answered by pointing at an existant that it caused.