(September 6, 2016 at 3:40 am)Alex K Wrote: JuliaL, brilliant.Good, I like brilliant---specially when applied to me.
![Rolleyes Rolleyes](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
But your point that you don't need the gas if you can lose the mass is well taken.
You don't even need to shed the 5.6 tons.
My transfer function for H2 generation from Al & OH- is:
1kg(Al)/(27gm/mol)*3molH2/2molAl*2gmH2/molH2* 1/(0.0899kg/m^3)=~1.24m^3/kgAl
And every kg loss from airship mass reduces the required volume by:
1kg/(1.205kg/m^3-0.0899kg/m^3)=0.9m^3 per kg loss.
These functions meet in the middle:
1.24m^3/kg*massloss+0.9m^3/kg* massloss=7000*m^3
Which solves at massloss =~3300kg
You need some other motivation to do the task. You need to take on cargo.
Could you be morally impelled to save some missionaries, their native bearers and luggage?.....Nah as an atheist (with no morality
![Big Grin Big Grin](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
How about rescuing the Swedish Bikini Team? No, not P.Correct enough.
How about the Swedish Bikini Team dressed as nuns that you don't unmask until under weigh? Oh the ambivalence, the ambivalence!
Quote:Could the electrolysis be driven simply by burning wood? They'd need a lot of wood, but that shouldn't be a problem for our friends.Tubular! having the engines driven for both H2 generation and transport by a smoke puffing wood gas generator would be awesome and very steam punk.
The will-they-make-it-back is definitely a subplot.
So how, exactly, does God know that She's NOT a brain in a vat?
![Huh Huh](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/huh.gif)