RE: A Necessary Being?
September 7, 2016 at 5:17 pm
(This post was last modified: September 7, 2016 at 5:20 pm by Levi_Black.)
(September 7, 2016 at 4:54 pm)Alex K Wrote:(September 7, 2016 at 4:52 pm)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: You thought he could understand. Turns out he Kant.
I think if you assume he actually Kant, you are putting Descartes before the horse.
The thing is... no matter whether you're talking about an essential prediction or an accidental prediction. Kant objection is still sound