(September 30, 2016 at 5:46 am)chimp3 Wrote: Isn't not agreeing with each other part of the scientific method?
Having listened to Krauss over the years, I would like to think that he is a scientist of integrity. I was really thrilled when he ripped WLC "a new one" back in 2013 in their second public encounter, just over 3 years ago. I think that Craig really deserved that, because Craig loves to quote other scholars out of context, twist their ideas, etc. On the other hand, Krauss' silence with respect to Kohli's paper (which he has been updating now for the past 2 years!) is somewhat deafening. It's Krauss right, of course (to respond to whomever he wants, if it at all), but it's disappointing at the same time. I guess that I had expected more.
