(October 7, 2016 at 4:21 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(October 7, 2016 at 4:16 pm)RobertE Wrote: Bolded part is mine.
That is from a strictly Christian, or indeed Catholic point of view. I mean, give me a nice woman anytime who is actually clean and uncut, rather than a woman who maybe cut and unclean. As for hygiene, cut or uncut, there is absolutely no difference except that as "uncut", men, we take pride in (I do anyway) our bits and make sure they are as clean as a car in a showroom, sparkly clean. Whereas a cut peen, well, I am sure there are men who take a more relaxed approach and thus get into a false sense of security thinking they are clean when in reality.......
Ignorant statement. Circumcision has nothing to do with Catholicism.
Ok then, enlighten me as to why you think it is important since there is absolutely NO medical evidence to the contrary that states that having a "cut", penis is more beneficial than an uncut one?
1. Cut more hygienic than uncut, disproved.
2. Men are happier in their lives uncut, proved.
3. Children carry emotional and physical scars into adulthood if they have been cut, proved.
4. If circumcision needs to be done because of fear of getting a sexual disease, then this is disproved as the overal muslim and jewish populations are expanding and are more likely to die because of poverty and their surroundings.
(October 7, 2016 at 4:24 pm)Rhythm Wrote: a light hearted aside.
What do they do with all the foreskins? What did they do with them back in the day? Is/was there some mohel somewhere sitting on a mound of foreskin, gloating over it like a dragon on a pile of gold?
The response is in the link I provided a couple of pages back.