RE: Another Circumcision thread
October 7, 2016 at 6:01 pm
(This post was last modified: October 7, 2016 at 6:03 pm by Whateverist.)
(October 7, 2016 at 5:01 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(October 7, 2016 at 4:49 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: This^
Though I must say I'm impressed at how much more civil this thread has been than the one I started.
-but does she, or you, "froth at the mouth and scream incoherent shit at pro fgm'ers" at the thought of clitoral removal? See, no one wants to touch this one.....
Same reasons offered, from the same traditions, same needlessness, same lack of any roundly demonstrable benefit - both genital mutilation done..by adults, to infants.....but one is a no go, and the other we don't give a shit about. Or, in fact, find ourselves arguing -for-.
Well that would be a good parallel if they were threatening to remove the best/most sensitive bits. But they're only looking to remove the protective blankey.
But more to your point, no I don't think modern law should respect tribal custom in the area of clit removal. Do you know of any countries that attach the same injunction to circumcision?