RE: Pressuposition Apologetics Cross Examined
October 18, 2016 at 9:36 am
(This post was last modified: October 18, 2016 at 9:36 am by Neo-Scholastic.)
(October 17, 2016 at 11:32 pm)Soldat Du Christ Wrote:(October 17, 2016 at 4:02 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: OP. Worst. Apologetic. Ever.
I'd like to know why you think so, that is why i made this thread after all.
I saw the video some time ago. It's so bad I don't think I can fully comprehend what they are trying to say. They beg the question on such a massive scale that I find it difficult to believe that anyone could take it seriously. Saying that someone must first agree with you before they can be convinced to agree with you makes no sense. If they already agree with you then they require no convincing. So what's the point? Then if they don't agree with you, you tell them they don't have the capacity for reason because they don't agree with you. Now that I think of it, that's just another kind of holier-than-thou douchbaggery that pisses me off.