RE: A quick word on "Overwhelmingly Negative Influences"
October 20, 2016 at 9:59 am
(This post was last modified: October 20, 2016 at 9:59 am by Faith No More.)
Well, I guess how much this particular "Overwhelming Negatve Influence" is actually contributing to discussions is up for debate, then. Given how much he(and let's face it, we all know who is being discussed) likes to antagonize and minimize the feelings of anyone that shows the slightest bit of vulnerability due to past experience, spends dozens of pages arguing semantics only to try and backtrack later, courts controversy for the sake of courting controversy, and generally relishes in getting a reaction out of people, I'm confident he's just trolling at this point.
I'm all for freedom of speech, but how far do we let someone who is so clearly abusing this freedom to skirt the "no trolling" rule? How many egregiously stupid and nonsensical things does he have to say before it's decided that he's just doing it to piss people off?
I'm all for freedom of speech, but how far do we let someone who is so clearly abusing this freedom to skirt the "no trolling" rule? How many egregiously stupid and nonsensical things does he have to say before it's decided that he's just doing it to piss people off?
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
