RE: A quick word on "Overwhelmingly Negative Influences"
October 20, 2016 at 12:24 pm
(This post was last modified: October 20, 2016 at 12:25 pm by brewer.)
(October 20, 2016 at 10:22 am)Shell B Wrote: People keep responding to the member you're speaking of, though I'm pretty sure this is about the recent rash of bandwagons as a whole. It's no secret that trolls get bored when no one responds. If he were truly a troll, the forum could easily police itself by ignoring him. The small, but vocal, group that seems the backbone of these complaints hasn't even tried that to my knowledge. From what I can see, the staff has given them multiple options from the ignore function to actual ignoring which have thus far been the only things they've ignored.bold mine
Every member is a valuable member to some degree, so I hate to see you guys losing people you like, but it's important not to change rules under threat of losing donations or membership. If the staff voted against something, that means the majority were against, as you know. If they pander to one because he either threatens to leave or actually does leave, it destroys the integrity of staff.
Well, that's fucking it! If you don't change and do what I want, I'm making the same donation from now on. Take that. I hope you'er happy. See what you made me do!
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.