(October 24, 2016 at 8:57 pm)Faith No More Wrote:(October 24, 2016 at 5:22 pm)Cato Wrote: As of this moment, I will likely cast my vote for Johnson. I say 'likely' since I have considered not voting for POTUS; however, since I will be voting on other items know I'll have trouble leaving the POTUS choice blank. I will not vote for Clinton or Trump.
For those that argue I should vote considering the potential impact on others; I get the argument but maintain that it's too late. Nobody, Democrats nor Republicans, gave me much consideration when selecting these two buffoons. I could have voted for the likes of O'Malley or Webb in lieu of Trump, but Clinton is a non-starter for me and many others, regardless of how toxic Trump is. As far as going the other direction, I would have voted for Kasich; maybe even Rand Paul with the requirement of a decontaminating scrub and shower afterwards, if either faced Clinton.
[bold mine]
You don't like the two main buffoons nominated, so you're going to vote for a third buffoon?
Who's third party simply because he stormed off from the republicans in a huff because they wouldn't pick him as their candidate. And who when reublican governor of NM was essentially batting for the donminionist evangelical wing of the tea party.
That's what I don't get about libertarians in the US, they don't mind republicans being imposed on them (I have a different grief with libertarians in general, viz they support a braindead political philosophy).
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home