(November 2, 2016 at 12:50 pm)Drich Wrote: All of that means we only have one data point to explain the origins of the universe. All that it is, and all that it is made of. That is the big picture of what you are doing when you say the big bang is the origins of Bla bla bla..
You keep saying this, but it's simply untrue. Big bang cosmology is supported by multiple data points, from the CMBE to the observation of the red shift to gravitational waves to the theories behind it, namely Einstein's relativity. The picture you are painting is simply false. It's true that there's only one Hadron collider, but seriously, if you're pinning your hopes of a demonstration on that, you're reaching. As noted, there were actually two experiments conducted at CERN, not just one.
(November 2, 2016 at 12:01 pm)Drich Wrote: Which leads us to the second half of the discussion with the CERN scientists claiming to have found the Higgs Boson particle and it took a year for a 'peer' to object to their findings.. Long enough for the people who came up with the H/B theory to win a nobel prize...
Do you see it yet? can you see what I am 'on' about?
Science on the fringe level is so easily corruptible.
no or very little over sight, and is money/billions upon billions of dollars driven. Never a good combination.
Maybe, maybe not. You haven't pointed out any actual corruption. Until you do, this is all in your head.
(November 2, 2016 at 12:01 pm)Drich Wrote: Which brings up back to my statement that it takes as much faith to believe in 'fringe science' as it does to believe in God, if not more, when corruption is found on the higher levels/at the source of the data that supports theories like the big bang.(emphasis mine)
When you actually find such corruption, then you can rant. So far you haven't.