(April 19, 2009 at 9:23 am)chatpilot Wrote: Kyu if that were the case then we would have to accept that all so called holy literature was inspired by God and if we do that then we would have to accept that since all of their messages are so different that there is more than one god.God is a creation of man and not the other way around you dont need a degree in anthropology,theology or any other ology to figure this out this is the part where common sense and and reason prevail.
Reason sure but common sense? Jeez man, that's what creationists use all the time against science ... is it common sense that one species can change into another? No. Common sense that unguided processes can bring about the appearance of design? No. There is a great deal of sense (little but actually) in science but little of it is common.
The simple fact is that no one (not a single one of us) can prove there is no god (and as such one can't absolutely argue a given god is a creation of man) but despite that, the assumptive position (that there is no god until demonstrated otherwise) makes vastly more sense than any other especially when one considers that despite the lack of testable deities there is heavy implication that no such entities exist.
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
