RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 4, 2016 at 10:34 pm
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2016 at 10:50 pm by ApeNotKillApe.)
(November 4, 2016 at 10:05 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:
(November 4, 2016 at 8:01 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: Non-omniscent, therefore not 'God', and the most probable not-a-god is no god.
Tradition is often wrong. (Only the theistic mind adheres to the concept of omniscient, omnipotent deities)
Thusly, on statistical observation, God/Creator is likely properly, naturally statistically definable as stipulated in the original post.
Great. Then define it. But I'm not reading your original post because it looks like dogshit.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.