On Logic and Alternate Universes

[FallentoReason]

You have explicitly imagined a system that is -different-...and then described it with the term used for the very system you distanced it from

Wrong, because

The discussion at hand just so happens to have a noun which is also an adjective. Your use of it, however, is completely uninteresting. And you've shown that already with other examples such as 'bobly' and 'fredly'. Completely void of any meaning, because yes, we already *know* bob = bob, and to be bobly is to be bob. Here's the kicker - 'logical' *is not* the same uselessness as the others. Look it up in the dictionary. Oh wait, I've done that for you and you've ignored it ever since coming to this thread. 'Logical' isn't reserved for a description of our logic. That's the entirety of your game that you're playing, and it's pointless. Our logic happens to be logical because it's a set of axioms. End of. Any other such set will also be logical because any other such set will count as being the thing which we, here on this universe, with the english language, call 'logic'. Anything outside of this - uninteresting uses of words and letters to convey absolutely nothing.