RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 7, 2016 at 7:01 pm
(This post was last modified: November 7, 2016 at 7:14 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 7, 2016 at 6:42 pm)Mathilda Wrote:(November 7, 2016 at 6:32 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Big fish/little pond synd?
Not even a big fish. His fragile ego means that he needs to believe that he's good at the subject but he doesn't actually understand much about it. I saw a lot of this on my Comp Sci degree as an undergrad. Young men would be boasting about how they got drunk and then went back and programmed something in C++.
No. I didn't understand it either.
EGOISM is but irrelevant. (..for I simply state statistics).
LEMMA OF MINE:
(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]
(1) I have composed non trivial models, SAMPLE: (utilizing residual neural network) for heart irregularity detection. (Deriving 76/500+ via international kaggle scale) {{See '
EJECTION-FRACTION-IRREGULARITY-DETECTION-MODEL.'}}
(2) A.... n fold orthographic quasicrystal-structured neural network scan behaviour pattern routine that manifests as a new type of tri dimensional artificial intelligence scan behaviour algorithm. {{See 'MORPHING-SOMATIC-QUASICRYSTAL-NEURAL-NETWORK'}}
(3) Hypothesis/Initial Implementation of non trivial general neural fabric, {{on the horizon of deep reinforcement learning, mathematics qua quatum computing, and causal learning (uetorch tower blocks)}} See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE'.
