RE: A quick word on "Overwhelmingly Negative Influences"
November 8, 2016 at 4:10 pm
(This post was last modified: November 8, 2016 at 4:11 pm by Crossless2.0.)
(November 8, 2016 at 3:52 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:(November 8, 2016 at 3:26 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: It was apparently "entrusted" to him for burial by the pathologist.
Wow, who knew you couldn't trust a priest not to desecrate the sanctity of human remains.
Stupid, stupid science guy!
I'd bet good money that the pathologist is a rabidly pro-life Catholic and was in on it. Not that anyone involved would cop to that.