RE: Science without Religion is lame
June 9, 2011 at 4:24 am
(This post was last modified: June 9, 2011 at 4:59 am by Castle.)
(June 8, 2011 at 5:58 am)Stue Denim Wrote: We've just had an atheist prime minister over here in aus, one who panders to the religious right like crazy in a vain attempt to make up for her atheism, but an atheist nonetheless.
How did that atheist prime minster work out, over all?

(June 9, 2011 at 1:14 am)eric209 Wrote:(June 8, 2011 at 3:32 pm)Castle Wrote: Gee, I connect well within my circle and to my millions of fans
You and I may have a bad connection somewhere. when talking about Einstein quote, mind you it is a very board topic
of course nevermind the fact that you totally try to dismiss that i was correct about your fallacys
We have had only a couple of exchanges, and I think you have mistaken me for some Christian you can go throw at the lions
Mmmmm fallacies which one does you want to pick?
1. A mistaken belief, esp. one based on unsound argument.
2. A failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid.
3. A statement or an argument based on a false or invalid inference.
4. Incorrectness of reasoning or belief; erroneousness.
5. The quality of being deceptive. ...
6. Containing or based on a fallacy: a fallacious assumption.
Or perhaps you are looking for the four and half hour argument?In which you must pay me a great deal of money for
(June 9, 2011 at 1:03 am)tackattack Wrote: millions of fans? What's your native language Castle?
We have Aztec some odd mix up of Heinz 57 in our Family, Speak English and more so Spanish and a few others a bit
What's your background?
