Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 31, 2025, 12:48 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Science without Religion is lame
#62
RE: Science without Religion is lame
(June 8, 2011 at 5:58 am)Stue Denim Wrote: We've just had an atheist prime minister over here in aus, one who panders to the religious right like crazy in a vain attempt to make up for her atheism, but an atheist nonetheless.

How did that atheist prime minster work out, over all?Wink


(June 9, 2011 at 1:14 am)eric209 Wrote:
(June 8, 2011 at 3:32 pm)Castle Wrote: Gee, I connect well within my circle and to my millions of fans

You and I may have a bad connection somewhere. when talking about Einstein quote, mind you it is a very board topic

of course nevermind the fact that you totally try to dismiss that i was correct about your fallacys

We have had only a couple of exchanges, and I think you have mistaken me for some Christian you can go throw at the lions

Mmmmm fallacies which one does you want to pick?
1. A mistaken belief, esp. one based on unsound argument.
2. A failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid.
3. A statement or an argument based on a false or invalid inference.
4. Incorrectness of reasoning or belief; erroneousness.
5. The quality of being deceptive. ...
6. Containing or based on a fallacy: a fallacious assumption.

Or perhaps you are looking for the four and half hour argument?In which you must pay me a great deal of money for

(June 9, 2011 at 1:03 am)tackattack Wrote: millions of fans? What's your native language Castle?

We have Aztec some odd mix up of Heinz 57 in our Family, Speak English and more so Spanish and a few others a bit

What's your background?Smile
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 5, 2011 at 10:31 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 5, 2011 at 11:24 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 1:03 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 1:06 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by jordi - June 6, 2011 at 2:07 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 2:10 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by jordi - June 6, 2011 at 2:28 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 2:48 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 3:16 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 11:36 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by orogenicman - June 6, 2011 at 4:21 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Darth - June 6, 2011 at 4:26 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 5:01 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Gawdzilla - June 6, 2011 at 6:49 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 12:10 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 11:45 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by DeistPaladin - June 6, 2011 at 11:57 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Gawdzilla - June 6, 2011 at 12:17 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 12:24 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 11:59 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by LastPoet - June 6, 2011 at 1:26 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 2:04 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 2:19 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 2:29 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Gawdzilla - June 6, 2011 at 4:28 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 2:12 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 2:42 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 4:47 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 4:53 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 5:38 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Welsh cake - June 6, 2011 at 3:29 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 4:26 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 5:07 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 5:54 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 11:09 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 7, 2011 at 2:22 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Anomalocaris - June 7, 2011 at 3:42 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Anomalocaris - June 6, 2011 at 8:17 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 7, 2011 at 2:06 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 3:30 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 4:09 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 8, 2011 at 1:02 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 7, 2011 at 4:42 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 8, 2011 at 12:47 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 8, 2011 at 3:32 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 9, 2011 at 1:14 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 11:04 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 8, 2011 at 12:22 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 8, 2011 at 1:14 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 8, 2011 at 1:38 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 8, 2011 at 5:19 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Darth - June 8, 2011 at 5:58 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Jax - June 8, 2011 at 6:59 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 9, 2011 at 4:24 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 8, 2011 at 8:53 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by tackattack - June 9, 2011 at 1:03 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by tackattack - June 9, 2011 at 5:17 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 9, 2011 at 6:09 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by tackattack - June 9, 2011 at 6:50 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 9, 2011 at 10:37 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 9, 2011 at 2:09 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Without citing the bible, what marks the bible as the one book with God's message? Whateverist 143 53618 March 31, 2022 at 7:05 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Without the Shedding of Blood There is No Remission of Sin Rhondazvous 231 73032 June 4, 2017 at 9:31 am
Last Post: Zenith
  Little children who died without Baptism go to eternal Hell?! Jehanne 34 7807 February 29, 2016 at 6:22 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Why i choose science reason and atheism over religion dyresand 28 9070 December 29, 2015 at 5:43 pm
Last Post: dyresand
Exclamation Without God You will Fail! Gods Squad 110 21660 October 19, 2015 at 9:28 am
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  How to prove Christianity is right without trying very hard Dystopia 6 4195 July 15, 2015 at 5:01 am
Last Post: Excited Penguin
  How to Prove Your Own Position without Trying Very Hard Randy Carson 59 14110 July 14, 2015 at 10:27 pm
Last Post: Ravenshire
  Bad/Good Things That Happen Without the Aid of a Deity Nope 30 11623 June 11, 2015 at 6:41 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Is it possible to be "born again" without faith? naturestubbs1 11 4842 July 9, 2014 at 6:27 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  See if you can watch 30 seconds of this Video without facepalming OhWord 18 6042 May 31, 2014 at 11:53 am
Last Post: BlackSwordsman



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)