(November 13, 2016 at 4:15 am)robvalue Wrote: I go into more detail on my website here.
Yes, so you're a weak atheist, that's the definition. If you don't want to call that atheism, that is fine. But to us you're an agnostic weak atheist.
I feel I must clarify. When you say, "If you don't want to call it atheism, that is fine," I feel a sense of belief that I am just in it to rebel. I identify as such because I feel it is the most logical.
Why would you say that is the definition? I have stated a numerous amount of times in the few posts that I have made in this thread that I do not identify as either, but rather, I operate off of the fact that we cannot know. With both beliefs being subjective, I don't pretend to lean towards either. We cannot know, and we do not have any basis of knowing besides evolution, something that even most Christians accept now, for one side, and a few old books for the other. When we have no basis of knowing, it is ignorance, and I'm not afraid to admit that. Therefor I have made no conclusions on what belief is truth, or has a higher probability of being true, but instead choose to remain neutral.
