RE: ☢The Theistic Response➼ to Atheists saying, "It Doesn't mean God Did it"
November 20, 2016 at 1:29 pm
(November 19, 2016 at 5:44 pm)The Joker Wrote:(November 19, 2016 at 4:31 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Rubbish.
A logical argument is not evidence for the existence of a god.
You can't 'logic' something into existence.
The CA commits several fallacies that make it invalid.
Usually, depending on the version of the CA, these fallacies are:
Affirming the consequent.
Fallacy of composition.
Fallacy of equivocation.
"You can't 'logic' something into existence."
I know you can't but you can "use logic" to prove the existence of God.
Think about it.
Every effect must have a cause. This universe and everything in it is an effect. There must be something that caused everything to come into existence. Ultimately, there must be something “un-caused” in order to cause everything else to come into existence. That “un-caused” cause is God.
Who says everyday logics or in this case cause and effect applied to the big bang or before the big bang/universe? Why doesn't cause and effect apply to a god? Why can't the universe be without a cause? Who says the universe isn't eternal, why pick a supernatural explanation before a natural one? You presumed many things before asking the question. Do you really think what you just said has never been thought of?
