For St. Thomas Aquinas, that is invalid, because what must be proved to be real via demonstration must start with things we are sure to be real. Hence, the 5 Ways of St. Thomas Aquinas all starts with what we can sense, for our natural knowledge starts with the senses. Although, without St. Thomas' objection, St. Anselm's argument have convinced many people.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 1, 2025, 4:12 pm
Thread Rating:
|
On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument - by FallentoReason - November 21, 2016 at 1:34 am
RE: On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument - by Silver - November 21, 2016 at 1:38 am
RE: On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument - by Thumpalumpacus - November 21, 2016 at 1:55 am
RE: On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument - by theologian - November 21, 2016 at 2:08 am
RE: On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument - by Silver - November 21, 2016 at 2:09 am
RE: On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument - by theologian - November 21, 2016 at 2:40 am
RE: On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument - by The Grand Nudger - November 21, 2016 at 10:03 am
RE: On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument - by FallentoReason - November 21, 2016 at 10:57 am
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
