RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 21, 2016 at 3:25 pm
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2016 at 3:28 pm by Simon Moon.)
(November 20, 2016 at 9:24 pm)Mariosep Wrote: Dear Simon Moon, we have to postpone your desire to resume our exchange, because I have just challenged Stimbo to a one and on exchange – see ANNEX, text in bold.
We never had an 'exchange'.
I pointed out obvious flaws in your 'proof' and flaws in your analogy of babies being created by biological reproduction, compared to the creation of the universe, and you never responded to any of them.
Here's how an exchange should work with discussions like this one:
You: post your 'proof' for the existence of a god.
Us: point our flaws in your argument,
You: respond DIRECTLY to our points concerning the flaws we think we have found. Giving your best reason why we are wrong.
Etc....
Instead what did we get? You immediately ignored any and all responses by us pointing out the flaws in your 'proof', then, in a complete non sequitur, you headed off on some path of wanting us to prove that noses exist.
And 90 pages later, you are still finding ways of ignoring us when we point out the flaws with your 'proof'.
And you wonder why you are receiving abuse and 'foul' language...
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
