I hold to a kind of philosophical naturalism. Things only exist as something, not as super-somethings. If things act in ways that their something "can't" do (e.g. 'miraculously'), then either it is a previously unknown ability of that thing, or it is the action of some other thing able to do that act within/through the original thing, or some combination of the two.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 14, 2025, 2:11 pm
| Poll: What's your stance on the supernatural? This poll is closed. |
|||
| Not a naturalist | 4 | 11.43% | |
| Methodological naturalist | 12 | 34.29% | |
| Philosophical naturalist | 16 | 45.71% | |
| Other (please specify) | 3 | 8.57% | |
| Total | 35 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Thread Rating:
|
Your position on naturalism
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


