Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 6, 2024, 12:21 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
#63
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 22, 2016 at 2:10 pm)The Joker Wrote: 8 Examples of Evolution in Action are all examples of variation within a kind they are not evolution.

This is going to get repetitive ...

(November 22, 2016 at 8:47 am)Mathilda Wrote: Your argument about 'kinds' shows that you do not understand the theory of evolution. Only creationists refer to 'kinds'. No scientist ever does and scientists are the ones who have researched evolution. You can't breed a fox and a donkey, but both species have a common ancestor. Evolution works in very small steps (or variation if you will) and these small steps accumulate over time. Speciation occurs when a population finds a separate evolutionary niche that can be filled and the subsequent generations become adapted to it instead.

You're the one using the term 'kinds'. How do you define a kind of animal? Do you define it as two species that cannot breed? In which case all you are doing is stating a tautology.

Try learning what evolution actually is before you try arguing against it otherwise all you do is perform a strawman argument.



(November 22, 2016 at 2:10 pm)The Joker Wrote: When it comes to dating the age of the earth.

"A circular argument arises: Interpret the fossil record in the terms of a
particular theory of evolution, inspect the interpretation, and note that it
confirms the theory. Well, it would, wouldn’t it?"
Tom Kemp, "A Fresh Look at the Fossil Record", New
Scientist, Vol. 108, Dec. 5, 1985, p. 67.


We also know the age of the Earth based on geology. I am not a geologist, I married one and have just asked him about it now as he as walked through the door.

Radiometric dating tells us that the Earth is over 4 billion years. We have rocks from the moon, zircon crystals that do not change once they form and the oldest one found is 4.4 billion years old. There is no chance that Zircon is pre-Earth. The heat of the Earth is consistent with our understanding the age and the radioactive material within. We can observe solar systems forming in other parts of the galaxy which is consistent with our understanding of the age of the Earth.

The fossil record is just one extra bit of observable evidence.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔ - by I_am_not_mafia - November 22, 2016 at 2:43 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 7596 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Foxaèr
  Why did Communists promote Evolution? Nishant Xavier 318 17392 September 7, 2023 at 5:48 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Is Atheism a Religion? Why or why not? Nishant Xavier 91 5346 August 6, 2023 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  The fascinating asymmetry of theist-atheist discussion Astreja 5 488 July 22, 2023 at 8:02 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  I'm no longer an anti-theist Duty 27 2110 September 16, 2022 at 1:08 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  I received a letter from a theist, need a good reply Radamand 22 2096 March 22, 2022 at 10:56 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Why do theist often drop the letter s when referring to atheists? I_am_not_mafia 56 12297 August 23, 2018 at 4:20 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
Tongue Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic Cecelia 983 156522 June 6, 2018 at 2:11 pm
Last Post: Raven Orlock
  Why was Newton a theist? Alexmahone 65 13264 March 24, 2018 at 12:39 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Why America is anti-theist. Goosebump 3 1139 March 1, 2018 at 9:06 am
Last Post: mlmooney89



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)